Trang chủHomepage forum Main Diễn đàn AlbumAlbumn ảnh LibraryThư phòng LibraryPhDvn in Media LinkWeb Links BlogTrang cá nhân Member ListDanh sách thành viên New posts Bài viết mới Private MailThư của bạn Control PanelBảng điều khiển SearchGoogle search TiviTivi FAQLuật Ban chã FAQDownload/upload Center




 
Loading...
  Lost your password? Lost your Username? Make a new account!  
Vietscholar forum  
 

Connect with Facebook
Go Back   Vietscholar forum > Academic Life > Bàn tròn PhD

Notices

Bàn tròn PhD PhDvn tọa đàm bên tách cà phê nóng..

PhDvn trên Facebook
Mời các bạn tham gia PhDvn /> </a><a onclick= Facebook group PhDvn và những người bạn.
Thông báo về cách thức tham gia online conference về hội thảo du học châu Âu

Trả lời
 
LinkBack Ðiều Chỉnh Kiếm Trong Bài
Old 08-11-2009   #1 (permalink)  
Kev's Avatar
Kev Kev is offline
Trusted member
Points: 2,759, Level: 32
Points: 2,759, Level: 32 Points: 2,759, Level: 32 Points: 2,759, Level: 32
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Tham gia ngày: Apr 2009
Bài gởi: 496
Thanks: 71
Thanked 301 Times in 133 Posts
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0

Default An interesting result in ECONOMICS related to our forum activities.

Mình đang học bài báo này, thấy quá đúng so với hoạt động của forums, đặc biệt là forum chia sẻ resources như là PhDvn. Có lẽ việc khuyến khích tất cả members chia sẻ là điều không khả thi và không bao giờ thực hiện được. Thật ra hiện tượng này xãy ra nhiều trong communications sytems như là P2P networks. Có những users gọi là free-riders, chỉ lấy resources mà không share bao giờ. Đọc bài báo thấy interesting khi nó dùng game gủng giải thích.

Không biết trong đây có ai làm hướng nghiên cứu này không.

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

Some conclusions:

1. The law of the few refers to the following social phenomenon: a large majority of individuals get most of the information needed for their decisions from a very small subset of the group, viz., the influencers.

Individuals often have to make a choice between alternatives whose advantages are imperfectly known. In order to make an informed decision, they personally acquire information and gather information through social contacts. Personal acquisition of information is costly; similarly, creating and maintaining personal contacts takes time and resources. Rational individuals therefore compare the relative costs of these different sources of information. This paper explores the implications of such individual choices for social communication and the aggregate information available in a society.

Our point of departure is a series of empirical studies about information acquisition and communication in social groups. The classical early work of Paul F. Lazarsfeld, Bernard Berelson, and Hazel Gaudet 1948 and Elihu Katz and Paul F. Lazersfeld 1955 investigated the impact of personal contacts and mass media on voting and consumer choice with regard
to product brands, films and fashion changes. They found that personal contacts play a dominant role in disseminating information which in turn shapes individuals’ decisions. In particular, they identified 20 percent of their sample of 4000 individuals as the primary source of information for the rest. Similarly, Lawrence F. Feick and Linda L. Price 1987 found that
25 percent of their sample of 1400 individuals acquired a great deal of information about food, household goods, nonprescription drugs and beauty products and that they were widely accessed by the rest. Research on virtual social communities reveals a similar pattern of communication. Jun Zhang, Mark S. Ackerman and Lada Adamic 2007 study the Java Forum: an on-line community of users who ask and respond to queries concerning Java. They identify 14000 users and find that 55 percent of these users only ask questions, 12 percent both ask and answer queries, and about 13 percent only provide answers.....
___________________________________________________________
124 điểm.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Lần đọc: 363
Tìm bài viết khác của Kev Gởi nhắn tin tới Kev
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Trả Lời Với Trích Dẫn
Trả lời

Bookmarks

Tags
bantron phd, phd, research, tiensi

Latex Maths & Physics Editor ...


Ðang đọc: 1 (0 thành viên và 1 khách)
 
Ðiều Chỉnh Kiếm Trong Bài
Kiếm Trong Bài:

Kiếm Chi Tiết

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is Mở
Smilies đang Mở
[IMG] đang Mở
HTML đang Tắt
Trackbacks are Mở
Pingbacks are Mở
Refbacks are Mở


Chủ đề giống nhau
Ðề tài Người Gởi Chuyên mục Trả lời Bài viết sau cùng
Physical Economics, some ideas Whitebear. Physics 15 07-02-2010 03:55 AM
Tầm quan trọng của references trong Econ (and related fields) Jenny Kinh nghiệm học hành, nghiên cứu, qualifying exam 37 03-18-2010 04:58 AM
Interesting articles for computational bio haichit. Chemistry and Chemical Engineering 1 02-04-2010 12:09 AM
Economics, KHTN hay KHXH Whitebear. Bàn tròn PhD 14 01-02-2010 02:22 AM
Interesting websites to visit for entertainment. Kev Giải trí 4 05-29-2009 11:01 PM


 
PhDvn.org
   
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:33 AM.  
 
Style by TheProphet  
 

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0